In the heat of India’s fiercely contested state elections, even the personal lives of political candidates are increasingly becoming fodder for online debate and scrutiny. One such incident that captured widespread internet attention was the viral dance video of AAP (Aam Aadmi Party) candidate Chahat Pandey—a clip that drew both amusement and sharp criticism across social media platforms and political circles alike.
Chahat Pandey, a television actress turned politician, was fielded by the Aam Aadmi Party from the Damoh assembly constituency in Madhya Pradesh during the 2023 state elections. What might have been a routine political campaign took an unexpected turn when an old video of her dancing to the popular Bollywood song “O Ladka Ankh Mare” unexpectedly resurfaced online and quickly went viral.
The one-minute, six-second reel showed Pandey energetically dancing, her moves echoing typical Bollywood enthusiasm. The video appears to have been shot in a personal setting and, according to several reports, predates her political entry. The timing, however, proved problematic as political commentators and detractors began to amplify it during the election season, framing it as inappropriate behavior for a public office aspirant.
Social Media Backlash and Troll Culture
Almost immediately after the video gained attention, it triggered a wave of online trolling and criticism. Numerous social media users questioned her judgment and suitability as a legislative candidate, often using the clip as a tool to mock or undermine her credibility. Some comments carried sexist undertones, reflecting societal prejudices about how women, especially those in politics, should conduct themselves in public.
Many detractors implied that her dancing was unbecoming of someone aspiring to represent a constituency, suggesting that she should maintain a more “serious” public persona. Others ridiculed the video without even acknowledging that her political and entertainment careers had different contexts—many replied without knowing that Pandey spent years as an actress before entering politics.
This kind of online discourse isn’t unique to Pandey; viral videos often become lenses through which public figures are judged, especially in emotionally charged environments like election cycles. In many cases, these reactions reveal underlying tensions about gender roles, societal expectations, and the boundaries between personal expression and public responsibility.
Defending Her Passion and Past
Against the barrage of criticism, Chahat Pandey did not remain silent. In conversations with media, she defended her video, explaining that the dance was from her personal life and not related to her political campaign. She emphasized that she is an artist by training with a long career in television, where dancing and performing are part of her craft.
She also expressed concern that the clip was being misrepresented with the intent to harm her political image and that of her party. Pandey accused political rivals of promoting the video strategically to cast her and the AAP in a negative light. Her argument resonated with supporters who pointed out that people have multi-faceted lives and that her past as a performer should not be weaponized against her.
This defense highlights a broader challenge faced by public figures: the blurring of private and public identities in the digital age. With social media magnifying every post, photo or video, even personal moments from years past can reemerge and shape public perception.
Supporters Weigh In
Not all reactions were negative. A number of internet users rallied to her defense, arguing that dancing is a harmless expression of joy and not a valid criterion for judging political aptitude. Some pointed out that there have been many respected politicians and public figures with artistic or entertainment backgrounds who have performed on social media or at public events without similar backlash.
Supporters also reminded critics that entertainment professionals transitioning into politics bring diverse experiences and should not be reduced to a single viral moment. They reasserted that one’s past—as an actor or performer—doesn’t invalidate one’s capacity to serve as a public representative.
Politics Meets Personal Life
The incident raises important questions about the expectations we place on political candidates, particularly women who step into the public sphere from creative professions. Is it fair to demand a sanitized persona devoid of personal passions simply because one chooses to enter politics? Or should the electorate embrace a more inclusive view that acknowledges a candidate’s multifaceted background?
Chahat Pandey’s experience reflects the growing complexity of how political personas are curated in the internet age. With viral content capable of shaping narratives far beyond its original intent, candidates must navigate not only policy debates and campaign strategies—but also the unpredictable currents of online culture.
The Bigger Picture
Ultimately, Chahat Pandey’s viral dance video episode is more than just a moment of internet gossip. It underscores how digital platforms can influence political discourse, sometimes disproportionately. A personal dance clip became a flashpoint for debates about professionalism, gender norms, and the intersection of entertainment and politics.
As political figures continue to engage with social media—from campaigning to personal sharing—the public conversation around them will likely grow more complex. In this landscape, incidents like the trolling of Chahat Pandey serve as reminders that empathy, context and nuance are essential when evaluating public figures, especially when their private expressions become public controversies.
In the end, whether one supports or criticizes Pandey’s actions, her experience highlights an important truth: in today’s world, the line between personal life and political persona is thinner than ever, and every public figure must learn to navigate this terrain with resilience and clarity.
Admin 
Suman Gupta 
Sanjay Mishra